Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0 (all builds)
Memory	7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181108
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '20 at 11:58
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100 83,528 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	49.9% Average	Memory 60.4 1-Core 68.4 2-Core 151 53% 93.3 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 308 33% 261 Pts	64-Core 308 19% 308 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.08% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 2.15 Parallax 0.97 3% 2.31 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 3.87 Splatting 2.78 3% 3.85 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.08% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB 15,567 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM91.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 163 157 167 151 164 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 293 Write 212 Mixed 200 SusWrite 166 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 53 4K Mixed 22.6 90% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 84.3 86% 142 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 88%
Hitachi HTS542516K9SA00 160GB-$298 2,804 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 128GB free Firmware: BBCZC3HP SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 44 45 45 45 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	25.1% Poor	Read 43 Write 41.7 Mixed 25 SusWrite 44.5 28% 38.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 30%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 850GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 106 104 94 104 105 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 43.5 Write 58.2 Mixed 42.8 SusWrite 102 45% 61.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G KHX2400C15/8G 12GB 595 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	55.5% Above average	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 20.3 MC Mixed 18.9 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 16.8 44% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 127 32% 127 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 331 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

CPU
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	79x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	57x
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	24x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	38x
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples	25x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	22x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	9x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	8x

RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	9x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	8x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $191

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16