Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory124.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '20 at 07:16
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6244
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 82
1-Core 138
2-Core 274
90% 164 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 950
90% 747 Pts
64-Core 2,668
165% 2,668 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 130 125 126 149 193 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.8% Below average
Read 215
Write 110
Mixed 115
SusWrite 155
33% 149 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 28.1
4K Mixed 16
65% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 21.4
DQ Write 22.3
DQ Mixed 21.2
16% 21.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 85%
USB3.0 FLASH DRIVE 32GB
29GB free, PID b128
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 17 18 18 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 42
Write 31.4
SusWrite 17.9
36% 30.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
23% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer AQD-D4U16R26-SE 8x16GB
8 of 24 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 35.8
98% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 7.2
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,475 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback