IBM System x3200 M2 -[436732U]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemIBM System x3200 M2 -[436732U]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM 4367
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '20 at 15:37
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3110-$200
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
43.3% Average
Memory 72.6
1-Core 43
2-Core 84.6
44% 66.7 Pts
4-Core 84.3
8-Core 84.9
11% 84.6 Pts
64-Core 85.1
5% 85.1 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT725025VLA380 IBM 250GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5DOA7CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 22 22 23 20 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 33.4
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 21.2
22% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
62% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 35%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
77GB free, PID a009
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 26 26 26 26 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 30.6
Write 6.7
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 23.5
21% 17.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
21.1% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.63 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical System x3200 M2 -[436732U]- Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: IBM System x3200 M2 -[436732U]-

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $238
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback