Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T5750-$99 2,050 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Memory 68.7 1-Core 23 2-Core 44.8 33% 45.5 Pts	4-Core 45.1 8-Core 45 6% 45 Pts	64-Core 45.6 3% 45.6 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 38%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB 7,332 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0827A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 210 209 208 210 208 MB/s Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.6% Average	Read 245 Write 207 Mixed 214 SusWrite 209 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 33.8 4K Mixed 17.6 71% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 79 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 36.6 46% 79.6 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 93%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$7 19,339 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 4GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 8.7 8.5 4 4.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 31.6 Write 4.7 Mixed 19 SusWrite 6.7 18% 15.5 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 3 202% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	13% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 3.2 11% 3.7 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 4 11% 3.83 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo T5800IntelBench 34%, 3,175 samples	5x
Core2 Duo T8300Intel $27Bench 37%, 2,604 samples	3x
Pentium Dual T3200IntelBench 32%, 2,188 samples	3x

GPU
Intel 965 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 0%, 3,066 samples	29x
Mobile Intel 965 Express ChipsetFamiliaBench 0%, 201 samples	1x
1.8b for Mobile Intel 965ChellBench 0%, 51 samples	1x