Today's hottest deals

Dell Latitude E6540

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Latitude E6540  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 04N3YC
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '20 at 10:16
Run Duration313 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 2950M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Memory 51.1
1-Core 48.4
2-Core 57.6
34% 52.4 Pts
4-Core 83
8-Core 83.1
11% 83.1 Pts
64-Core 85.9
5% 85.9 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Dell(1028 05BE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.06% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 3.69
Parallax 3.44
2% 3.11 fps
MRender 4.29
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.83
2% 3.08 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.06%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3276GSX 320GB-$10
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GS101X
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 60 66 57 68 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 52.4
Write 70.2
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 61
36% 50.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 47%
Generic Mass-Storage 32GB
3GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 11 9.1 12 13 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
8.93% Terrible
Read 11.7
Write 6
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 11.4
14% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.9
119% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.93%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
25.9% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 9.2
27% 9.33 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 4.5
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6540 Builds (Compare 2,360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6540

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback