Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dell XPS 8500 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0NW73C
Memory	20.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180625
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 16 '20 at 01:50
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	60%

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60 21,413 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	68.8% Good	Memory 80 1-Core 86.3 2-Core 172 66% 113 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 335 45% 335 Pts	64-Core 334 21% 334 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 5,763 User benchmarks, average bench 28% EVGA(3842 6153) 3GB CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 1884 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Lighting 41.8 Reflection 33.6 Parallax 44.4 34% 39.9 fps	MRender 31.3 Gravity 41.9 Splatting 34.4 29% 35.9 fps
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 30%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900J13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 406 436 300 148 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Read 417 Write 454 Mixed 371 SusWrite 300 87% 385 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 70.5 4K Mixed 37.2 131% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 342 DQ Mixed 198 176% 262 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 91%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$61 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 856GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 117 116 117 118 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	76.4% Very good	Read 150 Write 141 Mixed 76.7 SusWrite 116 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 84%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 870GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 99 99 98 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 91.8 Write 85 Mixed 74.8 SusWrite 98.2 65% 87.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 8502 1600 CL9 Series M378B5273DH0-CK0 8502 1600 CL9 Series 24GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 14.1 SC Mixed 15.4 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 80.5 50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	162x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	155x
GeForce GT 620NvidiaBench 2%, 17,163 samples	112x

SSD
PM830 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 63%, 9,379 samples	58x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	57x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	55x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	154x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	80x
NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 4x4GBNanyaBench 58%, 1,608 samples	76x

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $297

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16