Lenovo 10CTA019LS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemLenovo 10CTA019LS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Bantry CRB
Memory7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '20 at 07:40
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6500B APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 71.9
1-Core 61.9
2-Core 107
50% 80.3 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 159
24% 177 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8570D
Legend(17AA 30B2) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.351.1007.1005
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
4.65% Terrible
Lighting 5.53
Reflection 8.15
Parallax 4.91
4% 6.2 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 8.22
5% 5.69 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.65%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC66
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 78 89 72 95 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
43% Average
Read 64.5
Write 87.3
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 85.4
52% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173EB0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.9% Poor
MC Read 14
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 9.6
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 97.1
41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback