HP Z200 SFF Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Z200 SFF Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B48h
Memory1.2 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '17 at 15:41
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 680-$300
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.75 GHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 181
65% 115 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 236
31% 235 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1200
Nvidia(10DE 1140) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 369.26
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 14.5
14% 15.3 fps
MRender 20
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 14.5
13% 16 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
574GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 109
Write 147
Mixed 43.4
73% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 5.28
4K Mixed 0.7
196% 2.15 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 112%
BUFFALO External HDD 3TB
2TB free, PID 027e
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 19.1
Mixed 10.8
22% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.23
66% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 72%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
61GB free, PID 00f8
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.3% Very poor
Read 26.3
Write 20.1
Mixed 14.4
24% 20.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.99
4K Mixed 0.24
43% 0.51 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F 40GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
28.9% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z200 SFF Workstation Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z200 SFF Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback