Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateJul 01 '20 at 09:11
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6950X
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 61.1
1-Core 94
2-Core 148
58% 101 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 355
40% 313 Pts
64-Core 455
28% 455 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.2% Above average
Lighting 63.4
Reflection 76.5
Parallax 56.8
52% 65.5 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 83.5
Splatting 60.9
65% 82.6 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 75GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,816
Write 1,590
Mixed 1,724
1,290% 1,710 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 25.8
4K Mixed 25.2
4,457% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 503
DQ Write 473
DQ Mixed 427
4,098% 468 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 92%
Red Hat VirtIO 966GB
70GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1,872
Write 1,715
1,281% 1,793 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 25.7
4,241% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 505
DQ Write 379
DQ Mixed 15.4
1,405% 300 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 47.8
MC Mixed 39.8
112% 39.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 14.4
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback