Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '20 at 19:44
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$285
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Memory 87.8
88% 87.8 Pts
Poor: 78% Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3570 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 153
Reflection 145
Parallax 157
125% 152 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 131
Splatting 108
112% 141 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 116%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 338 296 324 302 284 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 380
Mixed 293
SusWrite 318
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 39.1
145% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 110
107% 170 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 92%
Great: 110%
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$40
67GB free
Firmware: S0614B0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 111 131 134 408 229 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1,666
Write 405
Mixed 180
SusWrite 215
133% 616 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 12.9
129% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 901
DQ Write 31.2
DQ Mixed 159
193% 364 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 137%
Great: 248%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
52GB free
Firmware: 3.ADA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 91 92 91 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 80
Write 79.8
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 91
55% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 54%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$84
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 49 49 51 51 51 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 114%
Asmedia ASM1053E 250GB
57GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.6% Poor
Read 37.8
Write 37
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 36.9
24% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
MC Read 40
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 39.7
102% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 37.1
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,929 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,010
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback