Aaeon BOXER-6841M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAaeon BOXER-6841M  (all builds)
MotherboardAAEON PBA-SKS04
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181026
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 19 '20 at 10:12
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
31.6% Below average
Memory 11.8
1-Core 83
2-Core 154
40% 82.9 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 444
44% 359 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2015) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 25.20.100.6323
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
4.31% Terrible
Lighting 5.47
Reflection 2.15
Parallax 2.84
4% 3.49 fps
MRender 2.76
Gravity 4.77
Splatting 6.48
4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.31%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Aaeon EP-SS25-256AACS 256GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM13.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 181 274 226 275 219 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.9% Excellent
Read 402
Write 347
Mixed 323
SusWrite 233
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 31.4
115% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 209
193% 298 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS1GSH64V1H 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
28.6% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 7.7
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 387
10% 387 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback