Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire E5-522

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-522  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Nami_CZL
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150324
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateJun 18 '20 at 01:44
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-7210 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Memory 36.3
1-Core 27.6
2-Core 48.9
24% 37.6 Pts
4-Core 60.4
8-Core 69.1
8% 64.8 Pts
64-Core 77.4
5% 77.4 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Acer(1025 0960) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1065.0
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
1.59% Terrible
Lighting 1.73
Reflection 4.04
Parallax 2.66
1% 2.81 fps
MRender 2.43
Gravity 1.67
Splatting 2.78
2% 2.29 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.59%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
851GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 77 78 67 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 95.5
Write 127
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 73.5
63% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.3
168% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 79%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$8
10GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 8.8 10 10 10 9.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 70.7
Write 20.7
Mixed 9
SusWrite 9.9
28% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4.7
14% 4.73 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 1.9
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 220
18% 220 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-522 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-522

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback