QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory448GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 448GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory318.8 GB free of 448 GB @ 0 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJun 17 '20 at 21:58
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 53.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 227
70% 132 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 884
79% 666 Pts
64-Core 3,804
235% 3,804 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Oracle BlockVolume 275GB
229GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 120 120 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 121
Write 210
Mixed 133
SusWrite 123
109% 147 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 5.7
953% 5.53 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 79%
Oracle BlockVolume 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 226 224 231 229 228 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
106% Outstanding
Read 140
Write 224
Mixed 174
SusWrite 226
142% 191 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 3.6
618% 4.13 MB/s
Oracle BlockVolume 69GB
1GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 30.2
Write 56
Mixed 33
30% 39.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 3.9
683% 4.67 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 28x16GB
28 of 28 slots used
448GB DIMM RAM
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
239% Outstanding
MC Read 103
MC Write 84.4
MC Mixed 117
289% 101 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 25.6
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback