HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	61.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Z400 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory	21.5 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101029
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 26 '17 at 12:27
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3550 7,649 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 88.7 1-Core 81.4 2-Core 158 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 280 8-Core 408 43% 344 Pts	64-Core 409 25% 409 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AB) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 372.70 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Lighting 76.1 Reflection 76 Parallax 73.7 62% 75.3 fps	MRender 72.9 Gravity 69.5 Splatting 74.6 60% 72.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SKC100S3120G 120GB 285 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: 503A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 108 18204935 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -50294067033441 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 887 (0D) Soft read error rate 56 56 2130321983751 (64) Unknown 0 0 1495 (AA) Unknown 0 0 7840 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 28 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 27 38 55837065243 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 18204935 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 108 108 -60443074756608 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 18204935 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 18204935 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 0 0 15 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1641 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1704 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1704 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2642	50.4% Above average	Read 240 Write 147 Mixed 172 41% 186 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 56.9 4K Mixed 20.6 80% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 42.7 65% 124 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 79%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 301GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 198 9117 (03) Spinup time 165 160 6716 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2489 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5364 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2410 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 986 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2475 (C2) HDA temperature 122 103 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 8 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	45.1% Average	Read 82.4 Write 74.4 Mixed 53 52% 70 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.85 4K Mixed 0.25 77% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5273CH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B5273CH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B5273CH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B5273CH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B5273CH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B5273CH0-CK0 58GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.4% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 15.9 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 11.4 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

CPU
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples	569x
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples	535x
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples	488x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	273x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	156x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	137x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	73x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	66x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 42GBUnknownBench 37%, 128 samples	22x
ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 46GBUnknownBench 45%, 108 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 46GBUnknownBench 46%, 280 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16