Today's hottest deals

Pegatron IPMH61P1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPegatron IPMH61P1  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON IPMH61P1
Memory2.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130614
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 13 '20 at 00:21
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User DOM-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 175
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 306
39% 295 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Device(1B0A 0157) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.97% Terrible
Lighting 1.03
Reflection 1.15
Parallax 0.94
1% 1.04 fps
MRender 1.67
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.91
1% 1.45 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.97%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 197 82 72 70 71 MB/s
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.5% Above average
Read 230
Write 192
Mixed 201
SusWrite 120
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 26.3
98% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 156
129% 186 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 94%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
466GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 136 137 137 137 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 130
Write 38
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 137
69% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-012.A00LF 9905471-006.A00LF 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.3% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 11.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 11.8
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IPMH61P1 Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Pegatron IPMH61P1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback