Today's hottest deals

HP Pro 3500 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics44.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pro 3500 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ABF
Memory3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '20 at 02:01
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G870-$68
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 90.4
1-Core 81.6
2-Core 164
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 158
22% 161 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 59%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1025 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.9% Average
Lighting 56.9
Reflection 50.7
Parallax 65.7
46% 57.8 fps
MRender 55.2
Gravity 55.7
Splatting 45.6
42% 52.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk U100 32GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.56.00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,029
Write 22.6
Mixed 29.7
213% 1,027 MB/s
4K Read 346
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 2.4
527% 116 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 41%
Q6MP6G030-2 30GB
20GB free
Firmware: 2.93
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
27% Poor
Read 142
Write 23.9
Mixed 52.9
SusWrite 22.4
13% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 21.4
4K Mixed 15.7
61% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 34.4
DQ Write 24.9
DQ Mixed 29.7
22% 29.7 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Ramaxel RMR1870EF48E8W1333 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.2% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro 3500 Series Builds (Compare 1,060 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3500 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback