Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	13.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 07 '20 at 13:46
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Core i7-5820K 10 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	Memory 30.5 1-Core 67.9 2-Core 106 38% 68.2 Pts	4-Core 124 8-Core 114 16% 119 Pts	64-Core 120 7% 120 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 79%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 38GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 22 20 23 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	13.5% Very poor	Read 267 Write 40.2 Mixed 64.2 SusWrite 21.4 21% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.3 5% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x2GB 575 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM RAM Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	27.8% Poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 12.2 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 0.7 14% 5.03 GB/s	Latency 252 16% 252 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16