Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics92.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '20 at 20:51
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 184
65% 116 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 489
47% 387 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
MSI(1462 3368) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.4% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 128
Parallax 107
95% 117 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 120
Splatting 97.3
87% 107 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 317 371 361 348 333 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 251
Write 328
Mixed 218
SusWrite 335
64% 283 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 21.7
77% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 309
236% 318 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 106%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
184GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 321 314 318 316 297 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 372
Write 347
Mixed 312
SusWrite 314
76% 336 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 28.9
94% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 341
260% 351 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 123%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
1TB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 91 93 92 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 90.7
Write 99.2
Mixed 49.9
SusWrite 92.8
61% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM3X4GB2133C11Y4 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.2% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 12.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 8.2
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,778 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $920
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $256Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback