HP p6604f

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP p6604f  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AB1
Memory3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '20 at 02:10
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Memory 67.5
1-Core 37.3
2-Core 65.4
38% 56.7 Pts
4-Core 71.7
8-Core 70.6
10% 71.1 Pts
64-Core 71.1
4% 71.1 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Asus(1043 03CA) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.05% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1.58
Parallax 1.62
1% 1.5 fps
MRender 1.48
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.39
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.05%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 600ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 115 123 129 127 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 134
Write 144
Mixed 138
SusWrite 122
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 17.7
65% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 35.1
48% 88.2 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 85%
Seagate BUP Slim 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 26 27 28 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 20
Write 26.7
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 24.9
18% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 70%
Hitachi HDS721075CLA332 750GB-$190
638GB free
Firmware: JP3OA3GC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 116 124 130 127 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 132
Write 136
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 123
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.6% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 8.9
22% 7.87 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6604f Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP p6604f

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback