Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookPro11,2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive98.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple MacBookPro11,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-3CBD00234E554E41
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160222
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 05 '20 at 00:55
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 89.7
2-Core 171
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 452
46% 375 Pts
64-Core 455
28% 455 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 5200 (V2 Mobile 1.2 GHz)
Apple(106B 012E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
5.27% Terrible
Lighting 6.17
Reflection 6.31
Parallax 8.31
5% 6.93 fps
MRender 7.38
Gravity 3.7
Splatting 9.13
6% 6.74 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.27%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0256F 251GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UXM2JA1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 506 506 511 499 494 503 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 600
Write 514
Mixed 373
SusWrite 503
112% 497 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 29.8
98% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 410
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 183
168% 264 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
68.2% Good
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 19.6
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16.8
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro11,2 Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro11,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback