Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Qosmio X505

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive17.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba Qosmio X505  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Qosmio X505
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1680 x 945 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '20 at 17:41
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Memory 80.3
1-Core 59.1
2-Core 102
52% 80.6 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 214
22% 180 Pts
64-Core 214
13% 214 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 360M
Toshiba(1179 FF50) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
4.93% Terrible
Lighting 6.57
Reflection 6.96
Parallax 2.69
5% 5.41 fps
MRender 7.38
Gravity 4.43
Splatting 3.87
4% 5.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.93%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 67 52 23 20 117 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.1% Very poor
Read 120
Write 36
Mixed 32.4
SusWrite 70.1
14% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 7.6
22% 8.17 MB/s
DQ Read 17.9
DQ Write 20.6
DQ Mixed 18.3
14% 18.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$38
923GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 110 113 112 111 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 109
Write 108
Mixed 56
SusWrite 111
70% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT125S6BFR8C-G7 6GB
533, 533 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
34.5% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 10.4
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Qosmio X505 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio X505

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback