Dell Latitude E6230

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Latitude E6230  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0R6V5Y
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '20 at 10:28
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 149
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 213
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Dell(1028 0532) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
4% Terrible
Lighting 4.43
Reflection 5.85
Parallax 3
4% 4.43 fps
MRender 5.57
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.39
5% 5.48 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 194 198 179 199 185 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 385
Write 231
Mixed 147
SusWrite 193
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 13.2
62% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 88.4
DQ Write 35.6
DQ Mixed 50
40% 58 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6230 Builds (Compare 236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback