Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 15 '20 at 10:07
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6098P
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
26.8% Poor
Memory 36.9
1-Core 45.4
2-Core 85.3
32% 55.9 Pts
4-Core 92.5
8-Core 126
14% 109 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720
Asus(1043 8670) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 368.39
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
2.85% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 3.54
Parallax 3.41
3% 3.45 fps
MRender 3.71
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 4.26
3% 3.59 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.85%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
524GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 62 91 77 102 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
27% Poor
Read 11
Write 71.9
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 83.3
32% 44.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 27%
Great: 107%
TOSHIBA MK2565GSX 250GB
74GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 70 69 70 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 68.2
Write 70.8
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 69.8
84% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU21D4U5S1MB-4 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
19% Very poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 7.1
20% 7.17 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 3.9
9% 3.13 GB/s
Latency 217
18% 217 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD Builds (Compare 1,509 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $107
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback