Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory138.9 GB free of 384 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20150921
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '17 at 16:50
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
CPU socket #0, 32 CPU, 32 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 58.7
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 170
59% 106 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 658
58% 494 Pts
64-Core 2,051
127% 2,051 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 649GB
542GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Vmware Virtual disk 859GB
486GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 74%
Vmware Virtual disk 2TB
416GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Vmware Virtual disk 644GB
410GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 4% Great: 92%
Vmware Virtual disk 2TB
384GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Vmware Virtual disk 644GB
331GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 4% Great: 92%
Vmware Virtual disk 429GB
157GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 99%
Vmware Virtual disk 146GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 24x16GB
24 of 64 slots used
384GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
160% Outstanding
MC Read 85.6
MC Write 53.7
MC Mixed 62.5
192% 67.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 14.4
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 160%
Great: 160%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback