bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory11.7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 11.7GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory7.8 GB free of 11.7188 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121126
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 06 '20 at 08:34
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2144G
None, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.1% Above average
Memory 80.8
1-Core 75.4
2-Core 138
60% 98.1 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 131
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 121
8% 121 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Disco virtual de Microsoft 136GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 328 330 335 342 331 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
43% Average
Read 237
Write 206
Mixed 235
SusWrite 329
57% 252 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 21.4
4K Mixed 5.2
27% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 198
128% 148 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43%
Great: 68%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
695GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 312 318 337 343 333 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 284
Write 186
Mixed 135
SusWrite 326
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 14.7
46% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 251
194% 266 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 43GB
null MHz
3968, 8032, 32768 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.4% Very good
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 28.4
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 23.4
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback