Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteBook Folio 1040 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 213E
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190829
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '20 at 22:43
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4310U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 83.9
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 149
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 212
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 213E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
3.26% Terrible
Lighting 3.43
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 5.19
3% 4.71 fps
MRender 5.57
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 6.83
4% 4.88 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.26%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 371 402 313 411 372 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 394
Write 372
Mixed 184
SusWrite 378
75% 332 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 34.2
110% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 62.4
110% 215 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QHY-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 16.6
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook Folio 1040 G1 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback