Packard EasyNote_MX65

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive17.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemPackard EasyNote_MX65  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard EasyNote_MX65
Memory1.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20061129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '20 at 12:21
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 T5500-$18
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Memory 65.2
1-Core 19.2
2-Core 38
30% 40.8 Pts
4-Core 37.9
8-Core 37.5
5% 37.7 Pts
64-Core 37.6
2% 37.6 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Big Reservoir BR-128P6G 128GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM02.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.3% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 28
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 28.3
6% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 11.2
44% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 17
DQ Write 19.5
DQ Mixed 13.2
11% 16.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 17%
Kingston DT microDuo 32GB
25GB free, PID 16a1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 7.1 5.7 6.2 5.8 6.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
4.81% Terrible
Read 11
Write 1.2
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 6.3
7% 6.07 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
45% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.81%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.53 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback