HP Compaq Presario F700 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 7%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Presario F700 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta 30EA
Memory1 GB free of 2.5 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '20 at 07:27
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron 3600+
Socket S1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14% Very poor
Memory 23.3
1-Core 21.3
2-Core 25
15% 23.2 Pts
4-Core 28.1
8-Core 28.6
4% 28.4 Pts
64-Core 27.5
2% 27.5 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7000M / nForce 610M
HP(103C 30EA) 64MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 7.15.11.6743
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.09% Terrible
Lighting 0.17
Reflection 0.08
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.13 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.09%
Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1200BEVS-60UST0 120GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 12 15 26 35 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 27.9
Write 15.2
Mixed 15
SusWrite 22.7
15% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2GB
null MHz
2048, 512 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.87 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 3.8
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 297
14% 297 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback