Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E752

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK E752  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB252
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121016
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateApr 07 '20 at 18:01
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 157
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 211
29% 213 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 16C1) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.64% Terrible
Lighting 4.13
Reflection 5.42
Parallax 2.91
3% 4.15 fps
MRender 3.52
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 8.04
4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.64%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSFJ256GCSU 256GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JULA1102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 265 273 369 300 322 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 442
Write 396
Mixed 391
SusWrite 319
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 36.8
4K Mixed 27.5
84% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 138
136% 223 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 100%
USB 2.0 FLASH DRIVE 0GB
0GB free, PID 2168
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1.08% Terrible
Read 1
Write 1
Mixed 1
SusWrite 0.5
1% 0.88 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
20% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.08%
Great: 4%
Multiple Card Reader 16GB
10GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
1.82% Terrible
Read 0.5
Write 0.5
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 0.3
1% 0.45 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
36% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 1.82%
Great: 20%
Multiple Card Reader 16GB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
1.82% Terrible
Read 0.5
Write 0.5
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 0.3
1% 0.45 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
36% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.82%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
31.3% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.4
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK E752 Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E752

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $227
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback