Acer Aspire 5315

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire 5315  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Acadia
Memory1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20071109
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 03 '20 at 00:13
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 540
uPGA-478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Memory 23.6
1-Core 10.8
2-Core 7
11% 13.8 Pts
4-Core 8.9
8-Core 11.4
1% 10.1 Pts
64-Core 11.2
1% 11.2 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 0136) 384MB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2697
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.23
Reflection 0.23
Parallax 0.28
0% 0.25 fps
Splatting 0.13
0% 0.13 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 9.6 7.4 14 7.9 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 43.1
Write 16.7
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 10.4
17% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 36%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
9GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 3 1.7 4.7 2.5 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
3.59% Terrible
Read 13
Write 2
Mixed 9.9
SusWrite 3.5
8% 7.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.5
30% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 3.59%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
4% Terrible
MC Read 1.3
MC Write 1
MC Mixed 1
3% 1.1 GB/s
SC Read 1.2
SC Write 0.9
SC Mixed 1.1
3% 1.07 GB/s
Latency 295
14% 295 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 4%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5315 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5315

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback