HP p7-1234

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP p7-1234  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACF
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120704
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateMar 25 '20 at 01:11
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3650 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
43% Average
Memory 67.4
1-Core 35.7
2-Core 68.7
38% 57.3 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 101
14% 107 Pts
64-Core 99.2
6% 99.2 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
EVGA(3842 3733) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.92% Terrible
Lighting 8.63
Reflection 7.58
Parallax 9.06
7% 8.42 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 7.27
Splatting 7.13
7% 8.39 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.92%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
811GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 81 96 93 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 123
Write 87.3
Mixed 66.4
SusWrite 85.5
67% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 68%
FLASH Drive SM_USB20 4GB
4GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 6.6 6 6.6 6 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.16% Terrible
Read 9.7
Write 2.5
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 6
7% 6 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.16%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30% Poor
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 9.8
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.2
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p7-1234 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1234

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback