Today's hottest deals

HP Pro 3405 Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pro 3405 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACF
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '20 at 21:14
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-3200 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Memory 63.7
1-Core 37.2
2-Core 72.5
38% 57.8 Pts
4-Core 71.9
8-Core 72.3
10% 72.1 Pts
64-Core 70.9
4% 70.9 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6370D
HP(103C 2ACF) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.201.1008.0
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.72% Terrible
Lighting 1.87
Reflection 2.58
Parallax 1.41
2% 1.95 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.26
2% 2.48 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.72%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 27 48 51 56 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 130
Write 128
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 43
63% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
78% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.9% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 9
26% 9.13 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 6
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro 3405 Series Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3405 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback