Asus F5RL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive34.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus F5RL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK F5RL
Memory1.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080612
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 14 '20 at 14:02
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Extreme X7900
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Memory 50.8
1-Core 12.7
2-Core 21.2
22% 28.2 Pts
4-Core 22.9
8-Core 25.3
3% 24.1 Pts
64-Core 26.9
2% 26.9 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI RADEON XPRESS 1100
Asus(1043 1402) 128MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.400.0.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 0.27
0% 0.18 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 84 111 123 148 147 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.8% Below average
Read 187
Write 85.1
Mixed 158
SusWrite 124
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 14.3
59% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 25.3
DQ Write 52
DQ Mixed 32
26% 36.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
7.91% Terrible
MC Read 3
MC Write 2
MC Mixed 1.6
6% 2.2 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 1.9
6% 2.2 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.91%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback