Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory15.3 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 14 '20 at 02:27
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$30
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 103
2-Core 197
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 257
31% 240 Pts
64-Core 307
19% 307 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 240GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 136 109 130 97 118 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.2% Average
Read 277
Write 249
Mixed 244
SusWrite 133
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 8.4
50% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 131
129% 203 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 133%
WDC WD10 EZEX-60ZF5A0 1TB
931GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.39% Terrible
Read 32.2
Write 0.3
Mixed 0.3
SusWrite 0.6
6% 8.35 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.5
25% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.39%
Great: 47%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
709GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 25 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 28
Mixed 25
SusWrite 24.3
36% 27.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 55%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00RKKA0 1TB
90GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.2 3.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 28
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 3.2
28% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
116% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 44%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
104GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0 0.1 0 0 0.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
9.84% Terrible
Read 32.8
Write 20
Mixed 27
SusWrite 0.1
24% 20 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.84%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C9-8GXM 04CD F3-12800CL9-2GBXL 04CD F3-1600C9-8GXM 04CD F3-12800CL9-2GBXL 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048, 8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.5% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.5
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12.5
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 713 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $890
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback