Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650 7,756 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	69.2% Good	Memory 85.7 1-Core 77 2-Core 149 63% 104 Pts	4-Core 288 8-Core 398 43% 343 Pts	64-Core 1,010 62% 1,010 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Dell PERC H700 1TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 900GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.30 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 58 60 57 59 61 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 116%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB 9,173 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 5GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 16 11 9.8 15 15 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 30 Write 25.1 Mixed 14.9 SusWrite 11.6 26% 20.4 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.5 100% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 16x8GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 16 of 18 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 12.7 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 8.3 24% 8.43 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 93%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	5x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	4x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	5x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	2x

RAM
M393B1K70CH0-YH9 00CE00B380CE M393B1K70CH0-YH9 01980097 9965516-045.A00LF 00CE00B380CE M393B1K70CH0-YH9 00CE00B380CE M393B1K70CH0-YH9 01980097 9965516-045.A00LF 01980097 9965516-045.A00LF 01980097 9965516-045.A0... 144GBUnknownBench 37%, 3 samples	2x
HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 12x8GBHynixBench 64%, 55 samples	1x
HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 63%, 132 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16