HP Compaq Pro 6305 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6305 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1850
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '20 at 14:03
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800B APU
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 60.1
2-Core 108
50% 80.5 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 188
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 375.70
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 19
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 16.9
16% 17.1 fps
MRender 22.6
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 16.5
16% 20.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 47 51 53 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 47.5
Write 49.5
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 50.1
36% 47.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
U A 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.9% Poor
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 10.3
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7.1
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 MT Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 17% - Very poor Total price: $20
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback