Today's hottest deals

HP hp workstation xw6200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemHP hp workstation xw6200  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 08B8h
Memory4.4 GB free of 8.00049 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '17 at 19:59
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.40GHz
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
28% Poor
Memory 44.5
1-Core 26.1
2-Core 45.3
26% 38.6 Pts
4-Core 66.8
8-Core 75.9
9% 71.4 Pts
64-Core 67.3
4% 67.3 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 8354) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 306.23
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.2% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 2.62
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.48 fps
MRender 2.62
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.78
1% 1.76 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.2%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$55
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 94.6
Write 97.5
Mixed 32.3
55% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.19
4K Mixed 0.26
68% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$45
9GB free
Firmware: 3.CHF Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Read 37.7
Write 37
Mixed 18.8
23% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.25
69% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 40GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33280 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.61% Terrible
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.13 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 1.4
SC Mixed 2.1
5% 1.9 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 9.61%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical hp workstation xw6200 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP hp workstation xw6200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback