Today's hottest deals

Intel H81

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel H81  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181205
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '20 at 04:37
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3240-$54
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 66.3
1-Core 18.8
2-Core 104
38% 63.2 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 181
23% 175 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
MSI(1462 8A90) 2GB
CLim: 752 MHz, MLim: 405 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.63% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 5.27
Parallax 4.06
4% 4.6 fps
MRender 6.14
Gravity 4.57
Splatting 3.13
4% 4.61 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
As340 120GB 120GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 42 48 42 50 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 427
Write 310
Mixed 130
SusWrite 56.6
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 18.4
4K Mixed 10.5
53% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 78.1
DQ Write 30.7
DQ Mixed 16.6
22% 41.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
124GB free
Firmware: 1H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 90 90 89 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 114
Write 104
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 89
69% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown FLFF65F-C8KL9 0420 F3-1600C11-4GNS 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.7
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 15.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81 Builds (Compare 3,017 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H81

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback