Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	5.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	43.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 9600B Quad-Core 25 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Socket 940, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	Memory 26.4 1-Core 33.8 2-Core 67.7 24% 42.6 Pts	4-Core 132 8-Core 136 18% 134 Pts	64-Core 136 8% 136 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 25%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570 19,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Sapphire(174B E193) 2GB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	5.35% Terrible	Lighting 7.1 Reflection 6.85 Parallax 5.78 6% 6.58 fps	MRender 5.71 Gravity 5.23 Splatting 5.57 4% 5.5 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.35% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03090004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 98 46 47 48 48 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.1% Average	Read 216 Write 183 Mixed 167 SusWrite 75 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 35.8 4K Mixed 26.5 90% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 30.8 DQ Write 56.1 DQ Mixed 36.1 30% 41 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	21% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 9 23% 8 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.97 GB/s	Latency 277 14% 277 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Phenom 8450e Triple-CoreAMDBench 38%, 118 samples	2x
Athlon II X2 220AMDBench 39%, 5,045 samples	2x
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	2x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	2x
Radeon HD 5500AMDBench 3%, 5,613 samples	2x

SSD
SSD 120GBLonglineBench 65%, 271 samples	1x
SF-SSD-120-PCB-RIN 120GBBench 65%, 7 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16