Axioo NEON MNW.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAxioo NEON MNW.  (all builds)
MotherboardAXIOO NEON MNW.
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091209
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '20 at 12:32
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo P7370
uPGA 479M, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Memory 43.7
1-Core 27.4
2-Core 43.2
26% 38.1 Pts
4-Core 54.6
8-Core 54.6
7% 54.6 Pts
64-Core 53.2
3% 53.2 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
SiS Mirage 3 Graphics
Clevo(1558 0804) 128MB
Driver: SISGRUMD.dll Ver. 7.14.10.5260
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 0.08
0% 0.06 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 12 14 5.9 15 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 35.6
Write 19.3
Mixed 11
SusWrite 14.2
15% 20 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
30% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 61%
Generic External 500GB
466GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 15 14 16 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
8.64% Terrible
Read 15.6
Write 15
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 14.5
20% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
57% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.64%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.27% Terrible
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.73 GB/s
SC Read 1.2
SC Write 1.2
SC Mixed 0.8
3% 1.07 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.27%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback