Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 105% UFO	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	289% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	6 Days
Run Date	Feb 09 '20 at 10:43
Run Duration	342 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495 50,170 User benchmarks, average bench 89% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	96.6% Outstanding	Memory 92.2 1-Core 158 2-Core 313 102% 188 Pts	4-Core 540 8-Core 1,190 100% 865 Pts	64-Core 2,911 180% 2,911 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3605) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2927 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.6% Poor	Lighting 32.3 Reflection 37.3 Parallax 30.3 26% 33.3 fps	MRender 46.2 Gravity 32.3 Splatting 42.2 33% 40.2 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 414GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2147 622 615 616 621 621 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	289% Outstanding	Read 2,491 Write 2,348 Mixed 1,634 SusWrite 874 411% 1,837 MB/s	4K Read 66.2 4K Write 157 4K Mixed 88.9 297% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1,050 DQ Write 891 DQ Mixed 974 729% 972 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 289% Great: 340%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$87 85,928 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 837GB free Firmware: S0118C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2120 2115 2106 2115 1869 1067 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	363% Outstanding	Read 2,594 Write 2,133 Mixed 1,529 SusWrite 1,898 457% 2,039 MB/s	4K Read 66.3 4K Write 189 4K Mixed 94.5 322% 117 MB/s	DQ Read 1,126 DQ Write 847 DQ Mixed 513 512% 829 MB/s
Poor: 175% ↑ This bench: 363% Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$123 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 926GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 456 456 457 456 455 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 448 Mixed 441 SusWrite 456 104% 461 MB/s	4K Read 39.4 4K Write 88.7 4K Mixed 53.7 176% 60.6 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 199 150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 466GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 457 456 457 448 298 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 449 Mixed 449 SusWrite 429 103% 458 MB/s	4K Read 40 4K Write 93.4 4K Mixed 53.6 179% 62.3 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 200 150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 129%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2.5TB free Firmware: FS2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 132 148 148 150 149 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	94.4% Outstanding	Read 183 Write 185 Mixed 72 SusWrite 145 107% 146 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 308% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 109%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$235 6,443 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 5.5TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 191 195 192 195 190 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 187 Mixed 82.5 SusWrite 193 116% 160 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.7 223% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 121%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3TB free Firmware: CC52 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 159 159 161 161 162 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Read 145 Write 125 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 160 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3733 C17 4x4GB 200 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	128% Outstanding	MC Read 51.3 MC Write 45.9 MC Mixed 45.9 136% 47.7 GB/s	SC Read 28.2 SC Write 27.5 SC Mixed 41.1 92% 32.3 GB/s	Latency 63.7 63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 128%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,841 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,306x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $129Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	873x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	835x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	571x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	516x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	405x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	340x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	273x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	142x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $935

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16