Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190424
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 03 '20 at 08:53
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173 264,837 User benchmarks, average bench 91% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	99.5% Outstanding	Memory 92.8 1-Core 145 2-Core 259 93% 166 Pts	4-Core 571 8-Core 817 87% 694 Pts	64-Core 823 51% 823 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 99.5% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Gigabyte(1458 22F7) CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.1.3 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	48% Average	Lighting 59.4 Reflection 60 Parallax 72.4 48% 63.9 fps	MRender 63 Gravity 59.7 Splatting 52.5 47% 58.4 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Geil ZENITH R3 240GB 163 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0526A SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 309 280 291 292 294 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 455 Write 414 Mixed 357 SusWrite 312 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 37.5 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 54.2 186% 68.3 MB/s	DQ Read 351 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 103 144% 265 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 111%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 117GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 137 151 151 151 150 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Read 137 Write 125 Mixed 30 SusWrite 147 79% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 103%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 14,232 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 508GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 110 109 108 109 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Read 60.7 Write 74.7 Mixed 31 SusWrite 109 96% 68.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK4GX4M1A2400C16 Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G 8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.4% Very good	MC Read 29 MC Write 27.3 MC Mixed 21.9 74% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 23.8 SC Mixed 23.2 60% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 62.5 64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	116x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	97x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	145x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	90x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	84x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $844

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16