Asus P8P67 DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '20 at 03:11
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 96
1-Core 99.3
2-Core 199
77% 131 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 506
56% 439 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 1996) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 114
Parallax 112
86% 111 fps
MRender 95.2
Gravity 99.4
Splatting 93.5
78% 96 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 364 314 314 313 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 488
Mixed 396
SusWrite 345
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 52.9
174% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 364
274% 368 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 112%
Great: 134%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB
330GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 109 110 109 110 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 104
Write 98
Mixed 59
SusWrite 108
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 76%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
95GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 64 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 69.8
Write 72
Mixed 49
SusWrite 64.5
47% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 57%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$97
684GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 101 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 110
Write 99.8
Mixed 103
SusWrite 101
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 85%
WDC WD20EFRX-68E 2TB
43GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 25.2
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 28.7
37% 28 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
111% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
69.6% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 21.9
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 19.4
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 53.9
74% 53.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,073 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 DELUXE - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $704
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback