HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 55% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	85.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Z620 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 158A
Memory	39.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141119
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Jan 30 '20 at 09:11
Run Duration	260 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 77 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Memory 54.5 1-Core 71.4 2-Core 134 50% 86.8 Pts	4-Core 285 8-Core 568 50% 427 Pts	64-Core 1428 88% 1428 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$296 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	85.7% Excellent	Lighting 106 Reflection 113 Parallax 105 86% 108 fps	MRender 137 Gravity 99.2 Splatting 82.7 84% 106 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: R013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 49 53 54 40 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 487 Write 415 Mixed 12.5 SusWrite 109 56% 256 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 7.1 4K Mixed 0.4 39% 10.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 92%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 216GB free Firmware: 1H20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 102 99 100 103 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 74.8 Write 80.8 Mixed 55.8 SusWrite 101 58% 78.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 69%
Lacie Rugged Mini USB3 4TB 765 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1TB free Firmware: 153E SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 87 89 92 94 89 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	43.5% Average	Read 63.8 Write 63.8 Mixed 54 SusWrite 86.8 50% 67.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.1 114% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 69%
ASMT 2115 2TB 165 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 170GB free, PID 55aa SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	Read 72.8 Write 69.5 Mixed 48.8 SusWrite 29.1 71% 55.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 74%
ASMT 2115 3TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 133GB free, PID 55aa SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 29 29 29 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 116 Write 114 Mixed 69.5 SusWrite 29.3 105% 82.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 129% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 76%
ASMT 2115 4TB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 114GB free, PID 55aa SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 30 30 30 29 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	26.9% Poor	Read 84.8 Write 87.5 Mixed 56.5 SusWrite 29.2 84% 64.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 95%
ASMT 2115 3TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 251GB free, PID 55aa SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 148 Write 143 Mixed 71.3 SusWrite 29.2 122% 97.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 125% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 76%
ASMT 2115 3TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 453GB free, PID 55aa SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 28 28 28 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	Read 112 Write 109 Mixed 64.8 SusWrite 28.8 100% 78.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 76%
ASMT 2115 3TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 33GB free, PID 55aa SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	Read 136 Write 129 Mixed 71 SusWrite 29.2 114% 91.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 125% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 76%
ASMT 2115 4TB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 310GB free, PID 55aa SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 30 30 29 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 117 Write 118 Mixed 67 SusWrite 29.4 106% 82.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 132% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 95%
ASMT 2115 3TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 242GB free, PID 55aa SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 29 30 30 29 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	Read 117 Write 120 Mixed 73 SusWrite 29.5 108% 84.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 76%
ASMT 2115 2TB 165 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 173GB free, PID 55aa SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	25% Poor	Read 78.5 Write 75 Mixed 49.8 SusWrite 29.1 75% 58.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ40RF4BCFD-DJ-F Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 EBJ40RF4BCFD-DJ-F EBJ40RF4BCFD-DJ-F Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 EBJ40RF4BCFD-DJ-F EBJ40RF4BCFD-DJ-F Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 Elp... 48GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42% Average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 13.3 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 5.8 21% 7.43 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,401 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	150x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	147x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	129x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	170x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	113x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	95x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	72x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	60x

RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 12x8GBKingstonBench 111%, 25 samples	24x
18JDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 8x8GBMicronBench 97%, 23 samples	20x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $345

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16