Supermicro X11DPi-N(T)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro X11DPi-N(T)  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X11DPi-N
Memory32 GB free of 63.998 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20190426
Uptime35.7 Days
Run DateJan 24 '20 at 09:32
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6154
CPU1, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 74.7
1-Core 85.8
2-Core 171
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 649
58% 487 Pts
64-Core 2,087
129% 2,087 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 480GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 288 287 289 281 275 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 305
Write 234
Mixed 216
SusWrite 285
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 15.4
51% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 84
DQ Mixed 104
80% 110 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 102%
Adaptec Array 480GB
226GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 618 625 621 620 578 541 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
Adaptec Array 480GB
108GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 496 527 517 521 506 467 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 72ASS8G72LZ-2G6D2 2x31.5GB
2 of 16 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
61.2% Good
MC Read 19
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 20.5
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 9.1
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X11DPi-N(T) Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

System: Supermicro X11DPi-N(T)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback