Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	22.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 0.35 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	9.33% Terrible	Memory 14.9 1-Core 10.5 2-Core 15.2 9% 13.5 Pts	4-Core 21.8 8-Core 24.4 3% 23.1 Pts	64-Core 22.4 1% 22.4 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 9.33% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.0 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	13.8% Very poor	Lighting 13.6 Reflection 15.4 Parallax 32.8 11% 20.6 fps	MRender 0.1 Gravity 33.5 Splatting 31.1 19% 21.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar SSD 256GB 6,360 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 211GB free (System drive) Firmware: H190117H SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 98 112 109 126 129 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.9% Poor	Read 144 Write 146 Mixed 150 SusWrite 116 31% 139 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 11.4 4K Mixed 6.5 23% 7.83 MB/s	DQ Read 80 DQ Write 55.2 DQ Mixed 52.2 43% 62.5 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NMUD340D81-1600C 2x4GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 4.5 14% 4.73 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 1.8 6% 2 GB/s	Latency 360 11% 360 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	2,016x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,354x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	710x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16