Asrock FM2A75 Pro4-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75 Pro4-M  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '20 at 19:08
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 131
62% 98.4 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 187
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
ASRock(1849 9901) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.27% Terrible
Lighting 6.07
Reflection 9.42
Parallax 5.38
5% 6.95 fps
MRender 6.24
Gravity 4.73
Splatting 9.65
6% 6.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.27%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 139 140 142 140 142 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 464
Write 139
Mixed 207
SusWrite 140
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 13.7
74% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 11.4
DQ Mixed 20.2
43% 96.1 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 123%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
465GB free
Firmware: 1AJ100E5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 25 24 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
9.71% Terrible
Read 8.2
Write 25.8
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 25.4
12% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
101% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 9.71%
Great: 77%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 320GB
6GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 36 40 41 41 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 39.3
Write 38
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 39.2
26% 34.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
88% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 54%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 250GB
64GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 35 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Read 43.8
Write 45
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 36.7
28% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT4G3D1869DT2TXOB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 257 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.4% Below average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 14.6
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 12.2
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A75 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75 Pro4-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $148
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback