TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJan 15 '20 at 11:58
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Virtual 82d9ed4018dd
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 63.2
1-Core 97.6
2-Core 207
67% 122 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 765
71% 592 Pts
64-Core 1,377
85% 1,377 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑
This bench: 70.6%
 Great: 71%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 1.5TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 333 332 332 332 336 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 309
Write 339
Mixed 288
SusWrite 332
72% 317 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 19.1
68% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 248
198% 272 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 66.3%
 Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 47.3
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 46.2
120% 42.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 100%
 Great: 223%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples4x
GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples8x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia  $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples7x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples5x
SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples3x
RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples23x
2x16GBQEMUBench 108%, 1,370 samples12x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples11x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback