Lenovo 30C5003HIX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 30C5003HIX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3138
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '20 at 16:47
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2144G
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 134
2-Core 258
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 745
65% 556 Pts
64-Core 731
45% 731 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000
Nvidia(10DE 11BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Lighting 33.4
Reflection 23
Parallax 27.6
27% 28 fps
MRender 27.3
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 33.7
25% 30.5 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,456
Write 1,428
Mixed 884
279% 1,256 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 63.3
218% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 848
DQ Mixed 180
258% 462 MB/s
Poor: 127% Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A2K43BB1-CTD Kingston 9965745-002.A00G 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91.2% Outstanding
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 28.9
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 38.1
SC Mixed 27.6
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback