Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190722
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 12 '20 at 19:34
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 73
1-Core 136
2-Core 265
85% 158 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 561
63% 496 Pts
64-Core 792
49% 792 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Asus(1043 842F) 1GB
CLim: 1137 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.53% Terrible
Lighting 10.6
Reflection 10
Parallax 12.4
9% 11 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 12.9
Splatting 14
11% 13.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.53%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 279 277 261 279 287 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 273
Mixed 268
SusWrite 274
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 39
152% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 237
200% 293 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
266GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 83 91 88 86 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 17.7
Write 83
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 87.3
40% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 112%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
86GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 61 65 62 65 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 77.5
Write 123
Mixed 92
SusWrite 65.8
126% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0
94% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
49.1% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 16.2
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 16.4
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,636 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback